According to our data, on average directors earn $162,000 a year while actors earn $131,000 a year. This difference is significant! Most people would say that actor makes more money than a director. But is this always the case? In order to find out, we did a complete analysis of data from both professions. In this article, we will give you the results of our study and tell you who actually earns more money.
When it comes to earnings, most people would say that actors make more money than directors. This is because actors are typically paid per performance while directors are typically paid for their work behind the scenes. However, this is not always the case. In fact, according to our study, directors earn significantly more money than actors on average.
Some say that actors make more because their work is more visible to the public, while others argue that directors have a larger role in the production process and are therefore more indispensable.However, there are many exceptions to this rule, and it largely depends on the specific situation.
Actors vs Directors: Which Earns the Most?
directors generally earn more than actors, but it depends on the project. On average, directors earn $162,000 a year while actors earn $131,000 a year1. However, some actors can earn between $75,000 to $200,000 or more per episode depending on their experience and classification2. In Hollywood, there is generally a hierarchy where producers make the most money, followed by directors and then actors.
Directors tend to make more money across the whole industry because they work in pre-production, production, and post-production, and they have to be there for the shooting of every scene, whereas an actor does not.
Depending on experience, most film directors earn between $250,000 to $2 million per project, while new directors typically earn between $250,000 to $500,000 per film, and studio film directors earn about $1 million per movie.
However, there are exceptions where some actors can demand huge salaries because many people will see a movie solely because that person is in the film4. In rare cases, directors who also write and produce their films can earn at least $20 million per film for taking on this additional work and creative control.
Salary of actors
Salaries of actors and directors vary greatly. Some actors earn millions of dollars per movie, while some directors earn a salary of only a few thousand dollars. It is difficult to determine who earns more, actors or directors.
Some people argue that actors earn more because they are the ones who are seen on the screen. However, directors are responsible for creating the vision for the movie and guiding the actors in their performances.
Salary of directors
The salary of directors is one of the most interesting and discussed topics in the entertainment industry. Though it is said that the actors earn more than the directors, there are some exceptional cases where the directors have earned more than the actors.
Perks of being an actor
Being an actor is a dream job for many people. It can be very exciting and fulfilling to portray different characters and tell stories. However, what many people don’t know is that being an actor can also be a very challenging profession.
Actors often have to work long hours and deal with difficult conditions. Despite the challenges, actors can reap many benefits from their work.
Perks of being a director
There are many benefits to being a movie director. Probably the most obvious is the pay. Directors often make much more money than actors.
For example, according to Forbes, the top 10 earning directors in Hollywood made an average of $22 million in 2012. That’s more than three times what the top 10 actors earned.
Who earns more producer or director or actor?
In the entertainment industry, there are three main roles: producer, director, and actor. While there is no clear consensus on who makes more money in these positions, there are a few general trends.
Generally speaking, producers make more than directors, who in turn make more than actors.
However, this is not always the case; sometimes an actor can earn more than a director, or a producer can make less than a director.
Who earns more actors or writers?
There has been a longstanding debate on which profession earns more, actors or writers. It is difficult to ascertain an answer as it largely depends on the individual’s circumstances and level of success. However, there are some general points that can be made in this regard.
Generally speaking, actors earn more than writers. This is partly due to the fact that acting is a more visible profession, and actors often have more opportunities to make money through endorsements and other means.
Who is more important director or actor?
Deciding who is more important, director or actor, can be a difficult task. With so many talented directors and actors working in the film industry, it can be hard to decide who deserves the spotlight. However, some experts believe that one person is more important than the other.
Director Michael Bay is known for his explosive action sequences and intense storylines. His films often feature large-scale explosions and action scenes that are sure to entertain audiences.
Critics have praised Bay for his ability to create exciting films that keep viewers on their toes. However, some argue that his films are simply loud and chaotic affairs that lack depth.
In contrast, actors like Robert De Niro often receive praise for their slower-paced performances. De Niro has been known for his powerful acting skills and even won an Oscar for his role in “The Godfather Part II”.
Do producers make more money than actors?
There is no simple answer to this question as it depends on the individual producer and actor, and the production company they work for. However, in general, producers tend to make more money than actors.
Producers are responsible for overseeing the entire production process, from pre-production to post-production, while actors are typically only involved in the filming process itself.
This means that producers typically have more work and greater responsibility, which leads to them earning a higher salary.
How much do child actors make?
The film and television industries are notorious for paying their actors and actresses very low wages.
However, there is one group of performers who often receive higher pay than their more experienced counterparts: child actors.
Depending on their level of experience and the size of the production, child actors can make anywhere from $100 to $10,000 per day.
Do child actors go to film school?
In recent years, there has been a noticeable influx of child actors in the film industry. Many parents wonder if sending their children to acting classes and pursuing a career in Hollywood is the right choice.
The answer is not always clear. Some child actors do go on to pursue formal education in film production, while others find success without any formal training.
How much do Nickelodeon actors make?
Actors on Nickelodeon shows make different amounts of money depending on their role and how long they have been working on the show.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles pay is a little lower, with the main actors making around $75,000 per episode.
How to become a Nickledeon actor
In order to become a Nickelodeon actor, one must first have some acting experience. This could be through participating in school plays, taking drama classes, or working on independent films.
It is also important to have a good sense of humor and be able to work well with children.
How much does Disney Channel pay their actors in 2022?
Disney Channel is a popular TV channel for children and teenagers. It is known for its family-friendly content and for paying its actors relatively low salaries.
However, in 2022, Disney Channel plans to increase the salaries of its actors.
According to a recent report, the average salary for a Disney Channel actor will increase from $125,000 to $250,000. This is a significant increase and should help to attract more talented actors to the channel.
What is the highest paying job in film industry?
There is no one answer to this question as there are a variety of high-paying jobs in the film industry. However, some of the most highly-paid positions are in directing, producing, and acting.
These jobs can require years of training and experience, and often come with a high level of risk. But for those who are successful, the rewards can be great.
Is it worth going to film school?
Film school can be a great way to learn the ropes of the film industry. However, it is not always necessary to attend film school in order to become a filmmaker.
There are plenty of resources available online that can teach you the basics of filmmaking. This is a skill that can be learned over time through experience and practice.
What is the most prestigious film school?
There are many prestigious film schools in the world, but it is hard to determine which one is the most prestigious.
Some people might argue that the most prestigious school is the one that has the best teachers or the one that has produced the most successful alumni.
However, others might say that the most prestigious school is the one that offers the best education.
What is the best film school in America? There are many prestigious film schools in America. However, it is hard to determine which one is the most prestigious.
For a person who wants to become a Hollywood star attending the best film school is essential. To me, the most prestigious school is the one that offers the best education. The Hollywood stars attend the best film schools in America.
The most prestigious film school is probably the USC movie school. This university has produced many Hollywood stars like Tom Hanks and Morgan Freeman.
Can you get a PhD in film?
Yes, you can get a Ph.D. in film. In fact, there are quite a few programs out there that allow you to do just that. However, as with any other Ph.D. program, it’s not going to be easy.
You’ll need to put in a lot of hard work and dedication if you want to earn your degree from a Ph.D. film school.
Who is the film theorist?
Film theory is a vast and complex area of study, one that can be difficult to define. In general, film theory refers to the academic examination of movies and the various elements that make them up: narrative structure, cinematography, editing, sound, and so on.
But who studies film theory? And can you get a Ph.D. in it? Let’s take a look.
What is the film theory PhD? What are the requirements?
The film theory Ph.D. program is far more than just learning what films are made of.
The film theory Ph.D. is an interdisciplinary program that combines the study of film with other areas, such as anthropology and sociology, to create a greater understanding of how movies work and what makes them tick.
In other words, it’s a Ph.D. program that uses film to study another area of the humanities.
The film theory Ph.D. program is not an easy one to get into, but it’s not impossible. You’ll want to acquire a few specific skills and knowledge before you start sending out applications.
How long does the film theory PhD take?
Most film theorists go on to become professors, but there are also industry-related jobs available for film theorists. The average length of a film theory Ph.D. program is about four years.
How do I apply to the film theory PhD program?
There’s no one application for the film theory Ph.D. program. It’s a lot like any other Ph.D. program — you’ll need to apply to your school of choice and then apply to their Ph.D. program.
Do I need an undergraduate degree?
Yes, but not necessarily an English one. You’ll need to have a bachelor’s degree in something that gives you a solid foundation in the first principles of film theory. That could be literature, philosophy, media studies, or even history.
What if I don’t have an undergraduate degree ?
You’ll still be able to apply, but you’ll need to get some kind of certificate in film theory, and that certificate will need to be from an accredited institution.
What about my GREs? Can I use them?
For the most part, yes! Your GREs are the basis for your application, so they’ll still be a factor in your application.
Keep in mind that GRE scores have a limited life span. As of this writing, you can only submit your GRE scores up to five years after you apply.
What is a director’s salary?
Director’s salaries vary depending on their experience, company size, and location. Generally speaking, directors who have 10 years of experience or more can expect to earn around $150,000 per year.
Directors with less experience may only make $100,000 or less. Directors located in large cities can often make more than those located in smaller towns or rural areas.
How is the director’s salary decided?
How directors’ salaries are determined is a topic of much debate. There are multiple ways in which directors’ salaries can be set, ranging from using the market value of a company’s stock to averaging out the salaries of all directors.
Many believe that director pay should be based on the company’s profitability, while others argue that directors should receive a salary based on experience and knowledge. Ultimately, it is up to shareholders and board members to decide how much a director should earn.
What percentage does the director get?
As a director, what percentage of the film’s profits do you get? This is a question that directors have been asking themselves for years and one that no one has ever been able to answer definitively.
A study by The Hollywood Reporter has attempted to shed some light on this question by analyzing data from interviews with over 200 directors. According to the study, the average director earns between 10-25% of profits, with the majority earning around 12%.
How does the percentage compare to other positions in the company?
When it comes to earning potential, some careers have higher ceilings than others. For example, a doctor can make well over $200,000 per year. On the other hand, a cashier may only earn around $27,000 annually.
What types of projects have you acted in before?
I have experience acting in a variety of projects across theater, film, and television. Some of my most notable roles have been as the lead in several off-Broadway plays, a recurring guest role on a popular TV drama, and supporting parts in a few independent films that went to major festivals like Sundance and Toronto.
I’ve always enjoyed diving into dense, emotionally complex characters and have sought out scripts that allow me to showcase a wide dramatic range. A few of my favorite acting projects have been performing Shakespeare on stage, working with up-and-coming directors on experimental film projects, and bringing original characters to life in new play workshops and readings.
Though I feel comfortable in any medium, I find that theater and intimate indie films give me the most freedom to take risks and fully inhabit a character.
What are some of your most valuable skills for an acting career?
Some of the skills I consider most valuable to my acting career are imagination, emotional availability, observation, memorization, collaboration, and persistence. I have a very active imagination that allows me to envision fictional circumstances and characters deeply.
I’ve also worked hard over many years to open up my emotional landscape so I can readily access any feeling or mood. Observation is key for carefully studying human behavior and transforming it into authentic acting choices. Memorization comes easily to me, so I can quickly break down a script and get it into my bones.
I’m a highly collaborative actor who loves building strong relationships with directors and other cast. And in such a tough profession, persistence is vital for sticking with acting in the face of constant rejection. Other useful skills are intelligence, humor, empathy, physical awareness, and adaptability. But imagination and emotional availability are likely my top two assets.
What professional training have you received as an actor?
I hold a BFA in Drama from NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts, which gave me a strong foundation in acting techniques like Stanislavsky, Meisner, and Chekhov. At Tisch, I was trained to approach acting as an artform that integrates body, voice and imagination.
My education stressed versatility as we worked in everything from classic plays to avant-garde productions. I also spent a summer intensive at the Yale School of Drama, which expanded my classical repertory and knowledge of Shakespeare. Outside of university, I’ve done scene study for film and television at studios like The Actors Studio.
I regularly take workshops to continue growing my craft, recently completing an improv intensive with the Groundlings. My ongoing classes and education have equipped me to work successfully across mediums in the professional world. The ability to refine my technique has been invaluable.
How do you prepare for a role?
My process for preparing a role starts with reading the script numerous times to immerse myself in the world and character’s perspective. I’ll closely analyze the dialogue to understand subtext and motivation so I can make strong choices.
If needed, I’ll do contextual research on topics related to the story and character that inform their backgrounds and behaviors. I spend a lot of time examining the relationships between characters and thinking about their backstories.
A big part of my preparation is working with costumes, props and sets to find how the character moves and interacts with their environment. And I use exercises like journaling, improv and visualization to get into the character’s headspace and bring them to life as vividly as possible.
It’s all about making them feel real, nuanced and lived-in. The preparation never stops, as I’m constantly finding new layers and perspectives throughout the rehearsal and filming process.
What is your process for memorizing lines?
I have a multi-step process I use to memorize lines efficiently. I’ll start by reading through the entire script at least once to understand the full arc. Then I’ll break it down into sections and work on memorizing it piece-by-piece, starting with my character’s lines. I’ll read the other characters’ lines aloud too so I have context.
Repetition is key—I’ll recite each section over and over, then string the sections together until I have a cohesive chunk committed to memory. I’ll record myself and listen back to test how the lines sound. I’ll also walk around and recite the lines while doing tasks to get the words really lodged in my brain.
Memorizing with other cast is hugely helpful too. I’ll also make sure I understand the subtext and intentions behind each line, not just the words. With this methodical approach, I can efficiently memorize pages and pages of dialogue for a script.
How do you handle criticism of your performances?
As an actor, criticism is something I’ve learned to handle productively rather than take personally. Reading reviews and feedback is an important part of the job, as it shows me how an audience perceived my work—which isn’t always as I intended. When I get negative criticism, I try to assess it objectively and filter out what seems biased or unconstructive.
If multiple critics make similar comments, I take that as a sign I should reflect on those choices. Critical feedback isn’t easy to hear, but mining it for insight makes me a better actor. I discuss critiques with directors to get their take.
I aim to be open-minded, while standing firm on my own educated artistic opinions. As long as I’m always working hard and making bold choices that serve the project, I can accept that my acting won’t be for everyone. Staying confident in my abilities while continuing to learn is key.
What is your favorite role that you have played and why?
My favorite role that I’ve played so far is Nora in Henrik Ibsen’s play “A Doll’s House.” I resonated deeply with Nora’s journey as she breaks free from socially imposed gender roles and discovers her own agency. The arc of the character is so dynamic—Nora starts as a repressed, frivolous housewife before emerging as an empowered, determined woman by the play’s end.
It was thrilling to play such profound transformation. The role also has incredible depth and complexity that allowed me to showcase my range. And the final scene, where Nora makes the decision to leave her family, never fails to electrify the audience.
I feel immensely grateful I had the chance to bring such an iconic character to life and make her relatable to modern audiences. “A Doll’s House” will always be a highlight of my career so far.
How do you approach working with other actors on set?
When working with fellow actors on set, I aim to be fully collaborative, open and supportive. Acting is such an ensemble artform that I know the production will be strongest if we all work together harmoniously. I like to meet my castmates early on to establish a friendly rapport and mutual trust.
During rehearsals, I welcome everyone’s input to create a safe space for exploration and risk-taking. I avoid judging other actors’ choices and know we each need room to try different tactics. If I ever feel disconnected from a castmate, I’ll have an honest chat with them about getting back on the same page.
I check in with them before high-stakes scenes so we both feel grounded. I also try to maintain a warm, professional attitude through long, stressful shoot days. My goal is that when we wrap, the entire cast feels like a cohesive, loving team.
What is your experience with improvisation?
I have substantial experience with improvisational acting from my training and stage work. I took multiple improv courses during my undergraduate acting program, which taught me to think spontaneously, listen closely and support scene partners.
I performed improv comedy with a campus troupe for two years, which was invaluable for learning to craft stories collaboratively and draw on my imagination in the moment. I’ve also done improvisational exercises frequently in rehearsals for both plays and films.
For one indie film, the director had us improv entire scenes to find organic character moments and loosen up the dialogue. My background in longform improv has shown me the power of being fully present and trusting my instincts. Improvisation skills make me more adaptable and reactive as an actor. I’m able to avoid over-planning and respond truthfully to what’s happening around me during a performance.
How do you stay focused and in character during long shoots?
Staying focused and in character over long shooting days requires stamina and disciplined concentration. I make sure to get adequate rest beforehand so I start each shoot day energized and clear-headed. During long takes or extended dialogue scenes, I stay concentrated by actively listening to my scene partners and staying connected to my character’s inner world and objectives.
Between takes, I try to separate myself from the crew and avoid casual chat that could take me out of the headspace. I use music, meditation or vocal warmups to keep my mind centered. If we’re shooting out of sequence, I’ll review the script and evolving character arc to keep continuity.
I also take physical and vocal breaks when possible without losing momentum. Staying in character all day can be hugely draining, so taking brief mental breaks to recharge is important. With preparation, intense focus and separation from distractions, I can immerse myself in a character for however long a shoot day lasts.
What inspired you to become a director?
I’ve been passionate about film since childhood and always admired the craft behind great movies and TV shows. As a naturally visual thinker, I was drawn to the director’s role in shaping cinematic stories and worlds. My enthusiasm was stoked by taking multiple film studies courses in college. I was fascinated learning about the techniques of legendary directors like Hitchcock, Kubrick and Bergman.
My interest in directing grew from a desire to contribute original artistic visions to the screen. I tried my hand at making short films in school and was hooked by the process of guiding actors and crafting powerful sequences out of raw footage in the editing room. The collaborative nature of directing appealed to me too.
Ultimately, I pursued this career simply out of a lifelong love for the magical, transportive art of cinema and storytelling. I’m inspired every day by the chance to orchestrate compelling films that move, uplift and provoke audiences.
What is your process for selecting actors for a project?
My process for casting actors is thoughtful and collaborative. Of course, I consider whether actors have the right look, skillset and training for each role. But more importantly, I evaluate if they possess the necessary depth, nuance and humanity to inhabit the character truthfully. I conduct intensive workshops with shortlisted actors to assess their range and chemistry with other performers.
I provide direction and coaching to see how they respond and take adjustments. I look for actors with emotional openness, intelligence and willingness to take risks. Input from producers and casting directors is valuable, but the final decision is mine. I cast based on raw talent over big names or buzz.
I take care to ensure diversity and representation in all my casts. The actor must feel like the living embodiment of the character, not just a performer reading lines. Matching the perfect actors with the perfect roles is immensely satisfying.
How do you work with actors to bring out their best performances?
My directing process always involves in-depth collaboration with actors. I start by discussing their insights on the characters to exchange ideas. I ask about their background and training to determine how best to guide their individual style. I create space for them to make bold choices that may surprise me. During rehearsals, I give gentle adjustments and only provide more explicit direction if absolutely needed.
I don’t force actors into choices that don’t feel authentic. I remind them to stay present and avoid acting solely to please me. To inspire great performances, I nurture a spirit of play and freedom to explore. I brainstorm motivations and backstory details with actors to get underneath the character’s skin.
My goal is to empower the actor’s creative instincts while keeping them aligned with the overall vision. I lead by example by remaining passionately engaged and committed to the work. My process relies more on inspiring actors’ intrinsic motivation than imposing rigid demands.
What is your approach to directing action scenes?
Directing effective action scenes requires meticulous planning and choreography paired with in-the-moment adaptability. I collaborate closely with the stunt team to block out the sequence beat-by-beat, ensuring it’s motivated and tells the story. We’ll visualize the scene from multiple angles and walk through the choreography.
I’ll adjust the blocking to best showcase the actors’ abilities. I allow time to safely rehearse the full-speed action and wirework. It’s key that the actors fully understand the scene’s geography and risks. I keep an open line with the cinematographer to get the right coverage. I watch each take closely and tweak anything that looks inauthentic.
During filming, I expect careful execution of the blocking but give actors freedom within that structure to react spontaneously, which livens up the performance. I maintain a calm, focused presence on set to get through these complex scenes efficiently. My methodical approach allows me to craft action sequences that are thrilling yet completely character-driven.
How do you handle conflicts on set?
Handling occasional on-set conflicts comes with the territory of directing. My approach is to stay calm, listen to both sides, identify solutions and keep the production moving. If conflicts arise between crew members, I speak to each person privately to understand their perspective, while also reminding them to leave personal issues off-set.
If castmates have a disagreement, I give them space to work it out themselves before stepping in if needed. I remind everyone that the ultimate goal is service of the project, not individual egos. Yelling or aggressive behavior is never tolerated. If a conflict reaches an impasse, I bring in producers or department heads to help mediate objectively.
While conflicts can be frustrating, I believe solving them in a thoughtful manner makes the team stronger and more collaborative. My job is to be a leader by setting an example of maturity, fairness and grace under pressure.
What is your experience with directing actors who are difficult to work with?
Throughout my directing career, I’ve encountered a small number of actors who were difficult to work with for various reasons. My approach is first to consider that they may be struggling with personal issues, and give them the benefit of the doubt.
I try to have a compassionate, one-on-one conversation to understand where they are coming from. If tantrums, bad behavior or unprofessionalism continue, I enforce that it will not be tolerated—everyone needs to contribute positively to the production.
If absolutely needed for the sake of the project, I will have difficult conversations about replacing them. However, this is rare. Usually, listening and showing care for what’s beneath their behavior results in mutual understanding and cooperation.
At the end of the day, I stay calmly authoritative and remind myself and others to focus on the work, not petty disagreements. Even when working with challenging actors, it’s my job as director to create unity.
How do you balance your creative vision with the demands of the studio or producers?
Balancing my creative vision as a director with the commercial interests of studios and producers is a delicate art. I approach every project knowing the production’s business realities and limitations—but hold firm to my own artistic integrity. I aim to collaborate, not compromise.
In pre-production, I’m open to productive creative debates with producers to get on the same page. Once filming starts, I focus discussions on making my original vision as compelling as possible.
If producers request changes that I feel undermine the story’s authenticity and nuance, I stand my ground and explain my reasoning calmly and rationally. However, I pick my battles; if notes address logistical issues like budget or runtime, I comply without fuss.
I’ve learned how to frame my choices strategically to both satisfy the financiers and achieve excellence. With experience, I’ve grown savvy at balancing art and commerce while fiercely protecting my creative identity.
What is your process for working with the cinematographer and other crew members?
I involve my cinematographer and other key crew members extensively throughout pre-production to design the visual language of the film collaboratively. We have ongoing discussions about color palettes, camera movement, lighting motifs and other elements that support the story’s tone and style. On set, I empower the DP to craft beautiful shots while voicing my feedback gently to keep their work aligned with the broader vision.
I make sure to approach the crew with respect, answer their questions patiently and acknowledge their hard work. I let department heads handle issues within their teams autonomously unless I’m asked to intervene.
My process involves hiring excellent craftspeople, communicating the vision clearly, allowing creative freedom within operational constraints, and facilitating interdepartmental cooperation. This dynamic collaboration allows everyone to feel ownership over the production and do their best work.
How do you approach directing a project with a limited budget?
Directing with a restricted budget requires resourcefulness, careful planning and maintaining focus on the story’s essence. I start by reworking the script if needed to condense locations, characters and other costly elements without losing quality. I prioritize spending on factors most vital to the narrative, like actors, key sets and adequate shooting time.
I get creative about how to stylishly capture locations and action on a budget. I collaborate with the production designer on inexpensive solutions for sets, props and costumes without compromising too much authenticity.
I focus on compelling performances and character relationships rather than relying on flashy technical elements. I engage in open conversations with the crew about the constraints and problem-solve together.
While limitations can be frustrating, they force me to return to the core of the story and characters. Given my experience creating narratives with emotional impact on shoestring budgets, I’m confident I can overcome any challenge.
What is your experience with directing actors who are also writers or producers on a project?
I’ve directed projects where actors were also involved as writers or producers, which requires diplomacy and an ability to navigate their dual contributions. I involved them extensively in pre-production discussions to get their creative perspective while also establishing my authority as director on set.
During filming, I would collaboratively discuss character choices but firmly make the final call on performance and blocking. If creative debates got tense, I’d clarify we must all show professionalism and leave personal feelings aside. I asked them to focus on their acting while trusting me to honor the broader vision.
Establishing trust and maintaining open communication was key. While collaborating with actor-writers or producers can complicate the typical actor-director dynamic, it has led to outstanding results for me when everyone respects each other’s roles and expertise.
What is the most important quality for an actor to have when working with a director?
From my perspective, the most vital quality an actor can offer when collaborating with a director is trust—trust in the director’s vision even if all the pieces aren’t yet clear to them.
Acting often requires taking creative leaps of faith. The best actors let me guide them to emotionally vulnerable places they may resist initially but that are crucial for authenticity.
Trusting the material is equally key—embracing the circumstances and words on the page rather than judging or questioning excessively. The actor must also trust their own instrument and ability to meet the challenges I give them. And they need to trust
In conclusion, it seems that a film director’s salary is not as high as one would think. While they may make more than the average worker, their pay is not as extravagant as one might expect.
This could be due to the fact that a director’s work can be easily replaced if they are not satisfied with their pay. With this in mind, it is important for directors to negotiate a fair and reasonable salary before signing on to a project.